I pondered Solaris for some time, but as I do not intend to build the OS "from scratch" and nexenta was to GUIed for me I started researching SME. What puzzled me is the theory and the practice: RAIDz is the best solution from a theoretical standpoint (maximum features available) but still raid 5,65+0 etc. are used. Why? Opensolaris supposedly stopped last February. John R Pierce schrieb: > On 04/02/11 1:54 PM, Dawid Horacio Golebiewski wrote: > >> I have trouble finding definitive information about this. I am considering >> the use of SME 7.5.1 (centOS based) for my server needs, but I do want to >> use ZFS and I thus far I have only found information about the ZFS-Fuse >> implementation and unclear hints that there is another way. Phoronix >> reported that http://kqinfotech.com/ would release some form of ZFS for the >> kernel but I have found nothing. >> >> Can so. tell me if fuse-ZFS is more trouble than it's worth? >> > > ZFS isn't GPL, therefore can't be integrated into the kernel where a > file system belongs, therefore is pretty much relegated to user space > (fuse), and its just not very well supported on Linux. > > If you really want to use ZFS, I'd suggest using Solaris or one of its > derivatives (OpenIndiana, etc) where its native. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >