On 04/04/2011 08:41 AM Sorin Srbu wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf >> Of ken >> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 2:02 PM >> To: CentOS mailing list >> Subject: [CentOS] about:plugins <-Re: interview request for ppl who have >> Shockwave/.Firefox working >> >> Under "Tools..." I have "Adobe Reader 9.3", "Adobe Reader 9.4" >> (temporarily disabled due to testing), "Helix DNA Plugin: RealPlayer G2 >> Plug-in Compatible", "NPAPI Plugins Wrapper 1.3.0", and "Shockwave Flash >> 10 0 r153", that's all. >> >> Now looking at about:plugins under "Shockwave Flash" it says: >> >> File: nswrapper_32_32.libflashplayer.so >> Version: >> Shockwave Flash 10.2 r153 >> >> So to your question, the evidence seems to be saying that, yes, >> Shockwave is the same as Flash, at least on Linux. Or do you see >> something different? > > Well, kinda' different over here, at least on Firefox4 running on WinXP. > > Shockwave Flash > File: NPSWF32.dll > Shockwave Flash 10.2 r152 > > Shockwave for Director > File: np32dsw.dll > Adobe Shockwave for Director Netscape plug-in, version 11.5.8.612 > > Some differences are expected I guess, platform-wise. Just wasn't sure if > Shockwave and Flash were the same thing. Will be quiet now. 8-) Well, this tells us that XP users are getting a higher version than us Linux folks. But we can't really get anything more than that from what XP tells us... or?