On Apr 4, 2011, at 3:11 PM, David Brian Chait wrote: > "SL didn't pass the muster in our env in terms of a drop in > replacement > for Centos. > > On the other hand, we have simply dropped in Centos in place of RHEL > w/ > o issue. > > Our env is a rather complex CGI/VFX based pipeline that is not trivial > to design or support. > > So if you have 12-24 months, I'd wait, seriously man, what's the > rush?" > > > I have to provide a reliable and scalable infrastructure, and that > requires a reliable provider / updates. While I do not need Centos 6 > today, this development cycle has certainly raised questions as to > whether the development process can be relied upon. The whole "when > it's ready" mantra works well for academic/individual users, but you > can't plan business processes based on it. Get over yourself. Buy RHEL then Mr. "provide a reliable and scalable infrastructure". - aurf