On 04/07/2011 08:11 AM, Radu Gheorghiu wrote: > On 04/07/2011 03:58 PM, Max Hetrick wrote: >> On 04/07/2011 08:41 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> >>> Please try to maintain some semblance of professionalism when you post >>> to this list. >> This coming from someone who frequently tells people to "SHUT UP" and go >> away and use something else. I guess that's far more professional than >> others trying to open up communications between a projects members and >> the developers. >> > Fully agree. This attitude has lead many companies I know to drop CentOS > in favour of other distros. This project is sure not going in the right > direction. > I know, I'm going to be told to use something else, I know I know, I'm > looking for alternatives. Good ... if you don't like CentOS, then we do not want you to use it. For people who do like it, we do want you to use it. What we do not want is for people to think that they have a Service Level Agreement with CentOS to produce updates on their schedule. If you WANT a service level agreement with me, then you may contract for one. If you pay me enough, I will guarantee you updates on what ever schedule you are willing to pay for. I will be very professional in my dealings with you in that case too. When you want something that is provided for free, and when you want to treat me like you are paying me a million dollars a year to give it to you, guess what ... You can also get service level agreements from Red Hat or from Oracle or Novell. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 253 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110407/188a4847/attachment-0005.sig>