On 04/11/2011 07:25 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > On 04/10/2011 05:00 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Steve Clark<sclark at netwolves.com> wrote: >>> On 04/07/2011 05:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: >>> Great. Please keep us posted. If the patches work as expected, they >>> will be a worthy addition to the cplus kernel. >>> I got a kernel built with the patches using the wiki and your notes in >>> 0004586 (thanks). I am pleased to report >>> that they appear to work as advertised. With: >>> net.ipv6.conf.default.forwarding = 2 >>> net.ipv6.conf.all.accept_ra = 2 >>> >>> Router solicitations were issued and router advertisements were accepted and >>> I could still forward packets. >>> >>> I didn't make new patches, I simply did >>> %define with_fuzzy_patches 1 >> I have built the latest version of cplus kernel with the patches >> applied. The proposed process for patch addition did work well. It is >> available as 'kernel-devel-2.6.32-71.24.1.el6.centos.ayplus.1' from: >> >> http://centos.toracat.org/kernel/centos6/centosplus-testing/ >> >> Steve, could you please test this kernel? Looks like this is going to >> be the first patch set added to the C6plus kernel. >> > Sure - I am downloading it now. > > Oops - I am using i386 not x86_64 and it appears you only have re-compiled the x86_64 kernels. At least that is what I am assuming looking at the dates and the fact the i386 kernel did not work in regards to the new behavior with router solicitations and router advertisements. -- Stephen Clark *NetWolves* Sr. Software Engineer III Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.clark at netwolves.com http://www.netwolves.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110411/7d9c38bc/attachment-0005.html>