On Tuesday 12 April 2011 17:36:39 John Jasen wrote: > On 04/12/2011 10:21 AM, Boris Epstein wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 3:36 AM, Alain Péan > > <alain.pean at lpp.polytechnique.fr > > > <mailto:alain.pean at lpp.polytechnique.fr>> wrote: > <snipped: two recommendations for XFS> > > I would chime in with a dis-commendation for XFS. At my previous > employer, two cases involving XFS resulted in irrecoverable data > corruption. These were on RAID systems running from 4 to 20 TB. Can someone(who actually knows) share with us, what is the state of xfs-utils, how stable and usable are they for recovery of broken XFS filesystems? Marian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110412/1169636a/attachment-0005.sig>