----- Original Message ---- > From: "aurfalien at gmail.com" <aurfalien at gmail.com> > To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> > Sent: Tue, 12 April, 2011 20:10:14 > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dag's RHEL Rebuild Project. > > On Apr 12, 2011, at 11:59 AM, Ian Murray wrote: > > > > > > >> This is really disrespectful to talk about on here. The devs spent > >> a ton of > >> their spare time to develop centos, last thing you should talk > >> about is > >> starting competing projects... > >> > >> Peter. > > > > I really don't get this list. The threads I have read on the Xen > > list suggest > > there is no problem with a discussion about the relative merits of > > KVM so why is > > everything so personal on this list? Something quite unhealthy is > > going on here, > > IMHO. > > Its not that at all (to me). > > Then again the Xen lists don't have ppl whining about a missed rel > date with personal attaches about leadership. I guess people are pretty happy with the way the Xen project is run. > > The guys maintaining Centos have ownership of the project which > results in a sense of pride and personal feelings about it. They have every right to be pride; no doubt a phenomenal amount of work goes into CentOS and I don't think there is much/any gripe on this list of the quality of the finished article. But of course, pride can be an inhibitor as well.. > > Plus, I think it was the timing of the post regarding DAGs RHEL like > project. Tensions are indeed running high, so yeah. > > There is an order of magnitude more traffic on this list then on the > Xen list. Erm, jury's out for me as to whether that would make a difference or not. > > - aurf > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >