On Apr 13, 2011, at 10:55 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 4/13/2011 12:47 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> >>> OK, if you are going to use that as an example, please tell me how >>> many >>> of those people made that choice knowing that updates were going >>> to be >>> months behind upstream. There's certainly nothing on the project >>> web >>> site to imply that. >>> >> >> How about I just use YOU as an example. >> >> You CERTAINLY know how long the updates take. >> >> How many INSTALLS of CentOS do you still choose to have? > > I think you know the answer for CentOS 6. I haven't deployed any new > services on CentOS since the 5.4 release, and am generally losing to > the > guy who favors SUSE here - and even the horde that favors Windows > which > has always been our largest deployment. Gross, Winblowz! We use it as a workstation VM in a pretty large scale but since its a VM, doesn't seem so bad as our host and primary OS is Centos. We've had some traction on Suse but since there is no comparable project like Centos in the Suse realm, its Centos all the way baby! - aurf