On Apr 15, 2011, at 4:48 AM, Rudi Ahlers <Rudi at SoftDux.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic <office at plnet.rs> wrote: > John R Pierce wrote: > > On 04/14/11 5:43 PM, Christopher Chan wrote: > >> On Friday, April 15, 2011 02:46 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > >>> On 04/14/11 7:44 AM, Christopher Chan wrote: > >>>> Now, if OpenIndiana resists using illumos... > >>> openindiana is under the Illumos project umbrella. They aren't going to > >>> use anything else. > >> Eh? I was under the impression that they are separate and that Garrett > >> Damore was rather unhappy with the initial direction of OpenIndiana in > >> not preparing for an illumos release. 148 is still not illumos as far as > >> I know. > > > > afaik, both are still using pretty much the last opensolaris kernel with > > minor changes > > > > > > I was going on this, which says OpenIndiana is a member of the Illumos > > Foundation, that Illumos was providing the core/kernel, and OpenIndiana > > is integrating it into a complete system aka distribution > > http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Frequently+Asked+Questions#FrequentlyAskedQuestions-WhatistherelationshipbetweenOpenIndianaandIllumos%3F > > > > They go onto say they are waiting for Illumos to mature before they > > integrate it. > > Eham..., CentOS mailinglist.... maybe to continue in private? > > Ljubomir > > > Eham....., many people are learning a lot more from this thread than a lot of the other threads in the past few days. let them continue, and don't subscribe to the tread :) I agree with both assessments, but since this is a CentOS list and this thread has now twisted into ZFS advocacy I must say as well, continue off list. -Ross -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110415/f9d71607/attachment-0005.html>