Kenneth Porter <shiva at sewingwitch.com> wrote: > --On Friday, April 15, 2011 8:56 PM -0600 Devin Reade <gdr at gno.org> wrote: > >> Check out Mulberry. <http://mulberrymail.com/> > > The main drawback to Mulberry is that it doesn't display images, and its > HTML rendering is primitive. But if you're like me and deal primarily in > text, and want to only open images and attachments explicitly (good way to > avoid infections), Mulberry works great. I would actually consider the image aspect an advantage rather than disadvantage, but YMMV. Most images in email seem to related to signatures, auto-appended organization, or spam-related (what little slips through my filters). If it's actually an image of interest, I can right-click and select to view or extract it, the former of which uses the OS's default image viewer (eog for CentOS, iirc). It also avoids the issue of web-bugs put into html email. Yes, the html rendering is primitive, but I don't usually notice as I have mulberry configured to show the text part of multipart mail, which works just fine in most cases. A few html-only newsletters I get are the only things that are so rendered, and they always have links to online versions. > It's particulary wonderful if you have a huge hierarchy of folders. Agreed, along with the rest of the observations. Devin -- The greatest productive force is human selfishness. - Robert Heinlein