> It sounds to me like "your big beef" is that you can't run the CentOS > distribution the way *you* want it run. Whether you agree or not, > doesn't change the fact that CentOS *is* enterprise ready.-- and many > enterprises use it. The only time there are significant delays in No, I would just like the name and website to match the facts. I would suggest that anybody that calls centOS "enterprise-ready" might have a different concept to what an enterprise is to me. Enterprise to me is at least a 1000 users and dozens of live servers. If CentOS is only suitable for test environment then I don't really class that as enterprise-ready, either. > > As for rebuilding, why would you want to rebuild CentOS? Why not do > what CentOS does and get the sources directly from Red Hat and rebuild > that? Obviously you must think there is still some value in the CentOS > name. > I was just trying to illustrate a point, rather than actually wanting to do it. > -- > RonB -- Using CentOS 5.6 > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >