On 04/25/2011 09:16 AM, Filipe Rosset wrote: > On 04/21/2011 06:41 PM, Bob Hepple wrote: >> On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 11:30:37 +0100 >> Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: >> >>> On 04/21/2011 12:18 AM, Bob Hepple wrote: >>>> Hmmm - it's 10 days on and I still can't see all of the [a-l] >>>> *.src.rpm's. I strongly suspect that something's gone wrong - or >>>> perhaps I'm looking in the wrong place - >>>> >>> >>> Yes, you are right. Amongst the various tests, there is one that checks >>> for dupe packages, and we have 2 anaconda srpms this time, the i386 and >>> x86_64 are built from identical srpm's; but I had to bump version on one >>> arch, without needing to do that on the other. So there are 2 >>> anaconda-srpm in the SRPMS/ repo, causing the test to fail and that >>> entire lot not going through. I like the test, and would like to keep it >>> in place, so will do a force-pass for now and that should see the >>> packages go through at some point today. >>> >> >> I'll look out them. >> >> Thanks KB, you're legend! >> > > > Hi guys, > > I'm still not seeing some SRPMs (eg httpd-2.2.3-45.el5) > Any news about it Karanbir? I have pushed what I think are all of the SRPMS for os and updates. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 253 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110425/b0f4f8b7/attachment-0005.sig>