John R. Dennison wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:32:08AM +0200, Eric Doutreleau wrote: >> yes indeed >> i look through the sources and the path is hardcoded >> it s really strange some packages for centos are built but obviously >> don't work. > > I am by no means an expert on connection tracking, but poking through > the sources from alt.ru I don't get the impression that the package as > supplied works at all. It's possible I am doing things incorrectly, > however. > > I am seeing segfaults with conntrackd and my earlier thought that it was > just a /proc path issue may not be fully correct as it's looking for > "nf_conntrack_count" and not "ip_conntrack_count" which is what is > present on the boxes I've looked at. > > Just for reference: I rebuilt libnetfilter_conntrack, along with > conntrack_tools, both from alt.ru, so there was no version mismatch. > > If you ever get this working drop me a line; I'd be curious to know > whether the package is indeed not working or I'm just doing something > brain-dead. > > Has anybody tried to use RPMForge package? Ljubomir > > > John > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos