[CentOS] 32-bit kernel+XFS+16.xTB filesystem = potential disaster
Warren Young
warren at etr-usa.comWed Apr 6 18:08:16 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS] 32-bit kernel+XFS+16.xTB filesystem = potential disaster
- Next message: [CentOS] 32-bit kernel+XFS+16.xTB filesystem = potential disaster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 4/6/2011 11:40 AM, Finnur Örn Guðmundsson wrote: > > Just a shot in the dark....but can't you have a x86_64 NFS server export > a fs larger then 16TB and mount that on your x86 machine for use with > your application? I already ran the two-server idea past the decision makers. It was rejected, even though this server I just built is going to replace an existing one purely to add the extra storage, and so it could have just acted as a storage side-car to the existing server instead. I don't know whether it was rejected on rack space limits or "cleanliness" or whatever. All I got was, "no".
- Previous message: [CentOS] 32-bit kernel+XFS+16.xTB filesystem = potential disaster
- Next message: [CentOS] 32-bit kernel+XFS+16.xTB filesystem = potential disaster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list