[CentOS] How can a company help, officially?
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comMon Apr 11 21:38:49 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?
- Next message: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 4/11/2011 4:02 PM, Ned Slider wrote: > On 11/04/11 20:16, Digimer wrote: >> >> /putting on asbestos pants. >> >> each release is more complex than the last. The web of dependency grows, >> so the reverse-engineering takes longer and longer. >> > > This is just complete nonsense. You clearly have no understanding of the > processes involved in rebuilding RHEL. CentOS doesn't reverse-engineer > anything, they simply rebuild the upstream sources. It's not rocket science. It's not simple... They don't ship until they reproduce something that they consider 'binary compatible' to the upstream binaries, which depends on a build environment containing some things that don't match the sources. Some of this is documented for the similar SL build but they aren't as picky about library linkage versions (which may not matter functionally anyway). -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?
- Next message: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list