[CentOS] [Thank you!] IMHO only RHEL is better than CentOS...
Cal Webster
cwebster at ec.rr.comTue Apr 12 21:46:38 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS] [Thank you!] IMHO only RHEL is better than CentOS...
- Next message: [CentOS] [Thank you!] IMHO only RHEL is better than CentOS...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 14:08 -0700, aurfalien at gmail.com wrote: > On Apr 12, 2011, at 1:43 PM, Cal Webster wrote: > > > ...based on my experience, for use in all non-certified enterprise > > operations (large and small) on general-purpose computers. > > Wow, what a great post. > > Thanks Carl, very cool. Thanks for letting me know someone read it Aurf. If I've helped encourage even one I'm happy. > Hope you aren't retiring any time soon, I see too many barnies in > charge making thoughtless decisions. As a consultant I'm often on the > outside looking in and what I see is a scary trend of rash and > flippant choices. > > - aurf Retire? Not likely anytime soon with 3 kids, 5 grandkids (and many pseudo-grands) and more on the way. Besides, there's so much left to see and do and so little time... Thanks to CentOS and OSS I'll never really have to retire anyway. ;-) ./Cal
- Previous message: [CentOS] [Thank you!] IMHO only RHEL is better than CentOS...
- Next message: [CentOS] [Thank you!] IMHO only RHEL is better than CentOS...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list