[CentOS] glibc-2.5-58.el5_6.2.i686 broken?
Johnny Hughes
johnny at centos.orgTue Apr 19 03:25:58 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS] glibc-2.5-58.el5_6.2.i686 broken?
- Next message: [CentOS] glibc-2.5-58.el5_6.2.i686 broken?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 04/18/2011 07:51 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 07:07:04PM -0500, Ron Blizzard wrote: >> >> At any rate, there are work-arounds -- for those who use Evolution, >> the SL update is probably the best. I'm kind of surprised that Red Hat >> has not issued a fix yet. > > There is an update in QA at Redhat now to address these issues. Do you know a bug entry with the patch (and/or SRPM) that they are using? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 253 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110418/25992576/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS] glibc-2.5-58.el5_6.2.i686 broken?
- Next message: [CentOS] glibc-2.5-58.el5_6.2.i686 broken?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list