[CentOS] glibc-2.5-58.el5_6.2.i686 broken?
Johnny Hughes
johnny at centos.orgTue Apr 19 10:52:41 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS] glibc-2.5-58.el5_6.2.i686 broken?
- Next message: [CentOS] glibc-2.5-58.el5_6.2.i686 broken?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 04/19/2011 05:13 AM, Ron Blizzard wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:25 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: >> On 04/18/2011 07:51 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: >> >>> There is an update in QA at Redhat now to address these issues. >> >> Do you know a bug entry with the patch (and/or SRPM) that they are using? > > This may not be what you're looking for, but it's the link to bug > posted on the forum. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693882 > Thanks ... the only thing there is the considerable work done by Troy Dawson on this, figuring out which of the patches to leave out to get Evolution and gnome-panel working again. I can't see anything from RH though. Maybe in one of the "closed to the public" bugs. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 253 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110419/d7ef6194/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS] glibc-2.5-58.el5_6.2.i686 broken?
- Next message: [CentOS] glibc-2.5-58.el5_6.2.i686 broken?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list