On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 07:22:43PM -0400, Brian Mathis wrote: > > All that is needed to stop the weekly explosions are some regular > updates about the process. Something like "Working on xyz package but > ran into this problem. Still have to look at packages abc and def" > would more than satisfy a vast majority of people complaining here. > It's mind boggling that the project just doesn't seem to understand > that. Couple questions for you, if you wouldn't mind? Do you complain to Redhat about similar issues? Do you complain to your sales rep about when the next release is going to drop, or what the hold-up on a release is? Assuming that you're a customer you would be quite dissatisfied with their reply, or to be more accurate, their lack of a reply. Why must CentOS be held to a different set of standards than the upstream? Redhat posts NO status updates and publishes NO timelines but yet CentOS gets no end of grief over their lack of the same. I do personally wish that there would be more status updates from TPTB but to be demanding of more updates is ridiculous. John -- Spring is nature's way of saying, "Let's party!" -- Robin Williams (1952-), American actor and comedian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110404/a0a8f259/attachment-0003.sig>