Tom H wrote: > It's the second time that I point out that the CentOS communication > policy (if you there is one) is completely unprofessional. You can let > off steam by saying "we're volunteers, so we can tell you to use > another distro if you're unhappy" but you do yourselves more harm than > good. If by doing so they harm the project, what is opposite of that? What they *gain* by following "proper" etiquette? Financial benefits? Gift? Glory? What I do not understand is, if they tell you to use that they are devoting their *spare/family* time to *if you like it*, or use something else if you do not, *WHY* don't "you/those" go and use that better product/project (in this case SL is constantly cited)? If you do not like how your hairdresser does you hair you will go to other one. If you do not like the taste of bread you are buying, you will go and by from other bakery. What is so tempting in CentOS that forces to bash at devs every single day (and I mean every complainant every day) and saying SL is better, raising blood pressure to devs (which is why they are loosing their temper), but keeps bashers wanting CentOS over the SL? I do not get it (and never will). Ljubomir