On 12/04/11 00:03, Dag Wieers wrote: > On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Les Mikesell wrote: > >> On 4/11/2011 5:32 PM, Ned Slider wrote: >>> >>>>> This is just complete nonsense. You clearly have no understanding of the >>>>> processes involved in rebuilding RHEL. CentOS doesn't reverse-engineer >>>>> anything, they simply rebuild the upstream sources. It's not rocket science. >>>> >>>> It's not simple... >>> >>> Which part isn't simple? >> >> The part where you guess why your build doesn't match the upstream binary. > > If it was simple, why would it take 86 days or 6 months ? I would like to > have an answer to that. Either it is hard, and more people could help fix > issues. Or it is simple and the CentOS developers have been slacking ? > In fairness, I did say it could be time consuming. I don't know what took 86 days. > Anyone from the QA team interested to share some information on what > happened during QA ? > The QA team are not permitted to comment on such matters as QA is a closed process.