[CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations

Tue Apr 12 15:00:57 UTC 2011
Marian Marinov <mm at yuhu.biz>

On Tuesday 12 April 2011 17:36:39 John Jasen wrote:
> On 04/12/2011 10:21 AM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 3:36 AM, Alain Péan
> > <alain.pean at lpp.polytechnique.fr
> > <mailto:alain.pean at lpp.polytechnique.fr>> wrote:
> <snipped: two recommendations for XFS>
> I would chime in with a dis-commendation for XFS. At my previous
> employer, two cases involving XFS resulted in irrecoverable data
> corruption. These were on RAID systems running from 4 to 20 TB.

Can someone(who actually knows) share with us, what is the state of xfs-utils, 
how stable and usable are they for recovery of broken XFS filesystems?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110412/1169636a/attachment-0003.sig>