[CentOS] glibc-2.5-58.el5_6.2.i686 broken?

Tue Apr 19 03:25:58 UTC 2011
Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>

On 04/18/2011 07:51 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 07:07:04PM -0500, Ron Blizzard wrote:
>> At any rate, there are work-arounds -- for those who use Evolution,
>> the SL update is probably the best. I'm kind of surprised that Red Hat
>> has not issued a fix yet.
> 	There is an update in QA at Redhat now to address these issues.

Do you know a bug entry with the patch (and/or SRPM) that they are using?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 253 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110418/25992576/attachment-0003.sig>