[CentOS] 5.6 - SRPM's

Tue Apr 26 01:35:40 UTC 2011
Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>

On 04/25/2011 09:16 AM, Filipe Rosset wrote:
> On 04/21/2011 06:41 PM, Bob Hepple wrote:
>> On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 11:30:37 +0100
>> Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote:
>>> On 04/21/2011 12:18 AM, Bob Hepple wrote:
>>>> Hmmm - it's 10 days on and I still can't see all of the [a-l]
>>>> *.src.rpm's. I strongly suspect that something's gone wrong - or
>>>> perhaps I'm looking in the wrong place -
>>> Yes, you are right. Amongst the various tests, there is one that checks 
>>> for dupe packages, and we have 2 anaconda srpms this time, the i386 and 
>>> x86_64 are built from identical srpm's; but I had to bump version on one 
>>> arch, without needing to do that on the other. So there are 2 
>>> anaconda-srpm in the SRPMS/ repo, causing the test to fail and that 
>>> entire lot not going through. I like the test, and would like to keep it 
>>> in place, so will do a force-pass for now and that should see the 
>>> packages go through at some point today.
>> I'll look out them.
>> Thanks KB, you're legend!
> Hi guys,
> I'm still not seeing some SRPMs (eg httpd-2.2.3-45.el5)
> Any news about it Karanbir?

I have pushed what I think are all of the SRPMS for os and updates.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 253 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110425/b0f4f8b7/attachment-0003.sig>