On 4/30/11 1:09 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
>
>> But the difference from upstream is really the only thing specifically
>> "centosy", and since it's binary compatible, that would leave us discussing the
>> artwork.... Besides, we are just twiddling our thumbs here.
>
> Are we? I don't see this and I don't understand your remark.
Has it really been so long since the upstream release that you've forgotten that
we might someday see a corresponding CentOS version and have to start figuring
out how to use it?
> I suppose you didn't understand *my* request. I ask that people behave so that
> this list remains a valuable source for peer-to-peer support.
I do understand it, but since you wanted specifically Centos issues, it's hard
to complain about the topic of how RHEL differs from Centos, since that and a
few quirks of yum are really the only things specific to Centos. And it's not
like an extra message or two is going to displace any technical information.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com