On 08/20/11 10:33 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > That looks like the PGDG postgres repos to me and not the distribution > postgres package, What is done there is pretty much out of scope for > that which Redhat does for their postgres/postgres84 packaging. yes, it is, but my point was, 'we' (or rather RH) could learn a trick or two from that. simply providing a dummy RPM that had dependencies on php53 and provides php would resolve these issues, unless there's an older package dependent on php that flat doesn't work on php53. -- john r pierce N 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast