On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 04:32:10PM +0100, Always Learning wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 10:34 -0400, Ross Walker wrote: I have noticed that in other areas where I am subscribed to a tech list of this nature and where there are multiple lists supposedly to separate topics, it doesn't work very well. One of the lists tends to become dominant and people just post there, occasionally cross-posting to one of the others. So, one list becomes general purpose and the others become mostly ignored. The result is a lot more people complaining about OT posts and arguing about where things should be posted - thus increasing the OT traffic. So, if people will just be a little less quick to complain about OT posts, this list would see an actual reduction in OT posts. ////jerry > > > How about specific on-topic lists, such as: > > > > centos.storage > > centos.deploy > > centos.manage > > centos.gui > > If subscribing to a few, but not all, one could miss really interesting > and informative, although unexpected, information in one of the others. > > If someone wrote about storage and also mentioned 'gui' that person, > according to your suggestion, should post to two lists and if they > explained, at the same time, how they deployed it, 3 lists instead of > one ? This inevitably means readers could seem multiple postings, > although in different lists, for the same topic and if responding should > they post 2 or 3 identical replies - one to each list containing the > posting ? > > Your idea could be modified to including on the subject line a one-word > prefix for the topic. For example 'Storage: ......' > > I concur with the others who thought OT traffic should be marked 'OT' > on the subject line and filtered out. Meanwhile retaining one Centos > Users list. > > > -- > With best regards, > > Paul. > England, > EU. > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos