[CentOS] CentOS 6, Postfix Dovecot
Ned Slider
ned at unixmail.co.uk
Wed Aug 3 17:58:55 UTC 2011
On 03/08/11 17:28, John Hinton wrote:
> I only have one Postfix server running at the moment and have some
> questions. On that install, I did Amavisd-new with ClamAV, SpamAssassin,
> Postfix and Dovecot.
>
> I know this is a bit off topic, but I'm really hoping for performance
> guidance.
>
> Is the added layer of complexity running Amavis worth the effort on a
> system with moderate mail flow? Or should I just go down the path of
> getting Clam and SA working with Postfix and be done with it?
>
That really depends if you want the extra functionality Amavisd-new
offers. For example, do you want to be able to quarantine spam/viruses
or simply tag them as such and leave it for the end user to filter in
their inbox? (although I suspect there's many ways to implement a
quarantine other than amavisd).
> Whatever path I decide upon now will hopefully be the future for other
> system builds to come. I have about a dozen Sendmail installs running
> (which will eventually need to be moved over). Some of what I didn't
> like about those is Clam/AV and other checks occurred on both incoming
> and outgoing email. We pretty much don't have an outbound email virus or
> spam problem, so were getting a number of false positives due to DHCP
> and clients being assigned a dirty IP address from time to time.
>
> So yes, what's a good mailserver setup which hopefully stays as close to
> upstream as possible on 6.0?
>
I don't see much relevance in what upstream does, but FWIW the default
MTA in RHEL6 is now Postfix. Dovecot is a sensible choice and integrates
well with Postfix. rpmforge has an updated amavisd/SA/ClamAV stack
that's generally very reliable for production use.
I run Postfix/Dovecot with Amavisd-new/SA/Clam on el5 and am more than
happy with that setup, but there are many ways to skin this particular
cat and much will depend on your own personal preference.
More information about the CentOS
mailing list