[CentOS] RedHat to CentOS packages
Ned Slider
ned at unixmail.co.ukMon Aug 1 19:11:23 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS] RedHat to CentOS packages
- Next message: [CentOS] RedHat to CentOS packages
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 01/08/11 17:10, Gabriel Tabares wrote: > Dear all, > > We're trying to use Nessus to monitor our system and we're having a hard > time mapping the package versions from RedHat to CentOS in order to be > able to report against CVE (vulnerability reports). > > After some research, we think that the mapping is as follows (using > HTTPD as the example): > > CentOS httd-2.2.3-43.el5.centos.3 is equivalent to RedHat > httpd-2.2.3-43.el5_5.3 > > So, it looks like CentOS replaces "_$MINOR_RELEASE" (in this case "_5") > with ".centos" . Is this a fair assumption or are there other rules we > are missing? Is this documented anywhere? > The CentOS developers outlined the naming in this rather lengthy thread: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2011-May/007477.html But as outlined in that thread it is not always easy (or indeed possible) to establish which upstream source a given CentOS modified package is built from. A more reliable method would be to check the changelog.
- Previous message: [CentOS] RedHat to CentOS packages
- Next message: [CentOS] RedHat to CentOS packages
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list