[CentOS] Two ftp clients? Why?
John R Pierce
pierce at hogranch.comWed Aug 3 17:48:40 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS] Two ftp clients? Why?
- Next message: [CentOS] Two ftp clients? Why?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 08/03/11 10:35 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Here's a question: back around '96 or '97, M$ announced that they'd made > NT POSIX compatible, including a Korn shell*. Is that anywhere inside > Windows, still? If so, I'd think it would allow a lot.... I'm pretty sure that was gutted some time around NT4 or NT5 (aka win2000). NT was originally designed as a true microkernel architecture, where 'Windows' (the win32 API) was a personality layer of top of the native kernel, and alternate personalities included Posix and OS/2. Various aspects of this were gutted as they got in the way of decent performance, anyways it was only Posix.1, which wasn't very useful except as a bullet point on a feature list. -- john r pierce N 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast
- Previous message: [CentOS] Two ftp clients? Why?
- Next message: [CentOS] Two ftp clients? Why?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list