On 12/22/2011 05:44 PM, fred smith wrote: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 04:56:42PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 12/22/2011 04:46 PM, fred smith wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 08:30:23PM -0700, Corey Henderson wrote: >>>> On 12/21/2011 8:23 PM, fred smith wrote: >>> <snip> >>>> >>>> If you come up empty (all the same kernel modules exist in both) then >>>> it's likely a bug in some kernel module. The "emergency_shell" part of >>>> dracut may be useful in debug this. When you reboot, during the grub >>>> menu, add this to the kernel's command line: >>>> >>>> rdbreak=cmdline >>>> >>>> During the boot process, you'll get dropped to a command line, and can >>>> run some of the basic commands provided intisde the initramfs. >>>> >>>> If you look at the "init" file inside the initramfs, you can see the >>>> different points you'll end up with with different arguments to rdbreak; >>>> ie, pre-udev, initqueue, etc. >>> >>> Having gotten nowhere, so far, I tried the above. I haven't any clue >>> what would be helpful to do when it hits a "breakpoint", but I just >>> typed "exit" to drop back out of the shell, a couple of times. it >>> eventually got to where it said "starting udev" then a few seconds >>> later the dump appeard on the screen again. but there seemed to be >>> more of it shown so I took a photo of it. If you feel like taking a look >>> to see if you can figure it out, you can find it at: >>> >>> http://users.rcn.com/fredricksmith/dump.jpg >>> >>> I don't know what any of it means, except that it mentions modprobe, >>> and it appears that the stack trace has something to do with sound, >>> perhaps modprobe croaks when loading/munging drivers for sound. >>> >>> If anyone of you can make more sense of it than I, I'd appreciate >>> the help. >> >> There is a new kernel building right now that might >> fix something ... though I do not see anything specifically about your cpu. >> >> Here is the errata link: >> >> http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1849.html >> >> If everything builds it should be released in a couple of hours. >> > > so it'll show up in a release channel (or CR repo) ? > > It will be in 6.2/updates/ Still building right now. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 262 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20111222/9b2fbde0/attachment-0005.sig>