[CentOS] iSCSI best practices
Reindl Harald
h.reindl at thelounge.netMon Dec 12 13:52:46 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS] iSCSI best practices
- Next message: [CentOS] iSCSI best practices
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Am 12.12.2011 14:49, schrieb lhecking at users.sourceforge.net: > >> Outage is one thing, but having the disk volumes disappear mid-transaction can be detrimental to a file system's health. > > To get this back on-topic and closer to the OP's requests, are there any > particular iscsi settings one should consider to increase resiliency and > minimise the impact of e.g. a rebooting switch? timeout settings? The > big disadvantage of iscsi is that you add another layer that can fail > (compared to having virtual machine images on a local disk). you should always have two links to your iSCSI device and two different switches so that it does not matter if one switch dies or reboots -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 262 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20111212/8f6bab5e/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS] iSCSI best practices
- Next message: [CentOS] iSCSI best practices
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list