[CentOS] Is Biarch with 6.x now dead?
Michael Lampe
lampe at gcsc.uni-frankfurt.deWed Dec 28 16:25:25 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS] Is Biarch with 6.x now dead?
- Next message: [CentOS] Is Biarch with 6.x now dead?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Biarch is actually only needed for libraries and support packages. > Running native i386 application on x86_64 does not make much sense > (third-party apps are another thing). I also like the option to compile, run, test, debug, etc. my own programs as 32 bit. That's why starting with 5.x there's not only the libs, but also the devel-packages. Biarch is at least to me a valuable feature. Anyway it's all there, just not in the ISOs it seems. -Michael
- Previous message: [CentOS] Is Biarch with 6.x now dead?
- Next message: [CentOS] Is Biarch with 6.x now dead?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list