[CentOS] what percent of time are there unpatched exploits against default config?
Johnny Hughes
johnny at centos.orgFri Dec 30 10:25:57 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS] what percent of time are there unpatched exploits against default config?
- Next message: [CentOS] what percent of time are there unpatched exploits against default config?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 12/30/2011 03:55 AM, Alex Milojkovic wrote: > There is a concept called dynamic firewall i am working on that should eliminate any brute force attempts. If you think about it, if you know someone is trying to break in there is no need to give them access to the server any more. So after a hundred wrong passwords you cut them off. > > http://www.fail2ban.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 262 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20111230/f593d3a7/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS] what percent of time are there unpatched exploits against default config?
- Next message: [CentOS] what percent of time are there unpatched exploits against default config?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list