[CentOS] what percent of time are there unpatched exploits against default config?
m.roth at 5-cent.us
m.roth at 5-cent.usFri Dec 30 20:35:13 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS] what percent of time are there unpatched exploits against default config?
- Next message: [CentOS] what percent of time are there unpatched exploits against default config?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Reinl, > > On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 15:28 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: >> why do you not tell this the idiot who is argumentating against kyes >> and thinks using password-login is smart? > > I don't like your tone. I'm not sure if it's me or Bennett you are > calling an idiot or both, but in any case you should mind your words and > try to understand the argument others are making before shooting off > your mouth. <snip> > Now if you have an argument to make about that statement I'm very > interested to hear it. On the other hand, if you start calling people > idiots on a public channel because you think they do not understand what > you are telling (where it's actually you who seems to be missing the > point they are making) I don't consider you a suitable conversation > partner. You should understand discussions on lists like these are made > on arguments not insults. Agreed. I don't even label as idiots the idiots who post here, asking us to tell them how to do the job they were hired for, without any indication that they've read man pages, or googled for an answer. mark
- Previous message: [CentOS] what percent of time are there unpatched exploits against default config?
- Next message: [CentOS] what percent of time are there unpatched exploits against default config?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list