Vreme: 12/15/2011 12:37 PM, Anne Wilson piše: > On 12/13/2011 07:53 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >> Vreme: 12/13/2011 06:47 PM, Anne Wilson piše: >>> To avoid similar problems in the future, can you give me some guidelines >>> for priority settings? It seems I got it wrong somewhere:-) Thanks >> >> It is not wise to have third-party repositories overwriting base >> packages. This should only be used by hand per package basis. >> >> I have created local repository where I copy packages I wish to replace >> and only that "third-party" repository has same priority as official >> repositories. >> >> RPMForge (now RepoForge) has "non-violent", or safe repository that >> *should not* contain packages that overwrite base packages, and >> "violent" repository named "extras" that is meant to overwrite base >> packages. >> > Thanks. I think that makes it clear - it seems that if I see this sort > of problem again I have to look at repositories that are not normally > enabled, and consider whether to temporarily enable them. Is it safe to > leave rpmfusion-free-updates.repo and rpmfusion-nonree-updates.repo > without a specific priority setting? The various testing repos are not > enabled. > You can keep all desired repositories enabled as long as you have yum-plugin-priorities installed and keep third-party repositories with lesser priority (larger number). Like base=1, epel=2, repoforge=3, rpmfusion-* =3, etc. Here is how I decided to setup third party repositories: http://rpms.plnet.rs/CentDOS.repo There are few changes needed like "torakat" repo with now centosplus kernels. -- Ljubomir Ljubojevic (Love is in the Air) PL Computers Serbia, Europe Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your trusty Spiderman... StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant