On 2/02/11 12:16 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 02/01/2011 11:43 AM, Ben McGinnes wrote: >> Critical: >> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0169.html > > This is irrelevant to CentOS, its an RHEL update; if there was to be > a critical or a remotely exploiteable issue that comes up we would > then do a release into 5.5, but mostly things are now building > /linking into 5.6, so releasing those with out the deps they build > against might cause interesting issue. Fair enough. I must admit to not caring as much about the Java stuff anyway, I was mainly collating a list of notices which might correspond. I use the RH lists to give myself an idea of what is likely to appear from CentOS. > if there is specific concern about the kernel's released, those can > be pushed into the c5-testing repo for early adopters.. Good to know, thanks. Regards, Ben -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 227 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110202/190d27e3/attachment-0005.sig>