On 02/13/2011 07:07 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Ross Walker <rswwalker at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Feb 13, 2011, at 10:22 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Bruce Ferrell <bferrell at baywinds.org> wrote: >>> >>>> so far all the mirrors I've checked have 3.9 in the directory for 3.x >>>> >>>> Can anyone tell me how to get back versions? I'm looking for 3.4 or 3.5 >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance >>>> >>>> Bruce Ferrell >>>> >>> Bruce, *why*? Given that RHEL 3 was published in 1003, the codebase is >>> over 7 years old, and even the commercial RHEL 3 is now on life >>> support for extended support contracts. Are you looking for something >>> specific? >>> >> Wow 1007 years old, that's some old code, was it chiseled in stone? >> >> -Ross >> > Hey, silicon is silicon..... > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > Yeah, I'm rebuilding a server with Oracle RAC and I wasn't sure exactly what version of RedHat was used to build it originally. Centos 5.5 results in the external iscsi volumes being improperly sized. It turns out Centos 3.5 works. Once, many years ago, someone told me he wouldn't tackle a job he was 100 percent sure of. This is one of those so I'm doing this very gingerly to avoide losing the DB on the raw disk