[CentOS] BInd Problem or Update SSL ?

Sat Feb 19 23:07:33 UTC 2011
John R. Dennison <jrd at gerdesas.com>

On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 04:37:57PM -0600, Larry Vaden wrote:
> THANKS for your input;  there exists a consensus, so that's what will
> be done (replace 4.8 with 5.x).  Troy says Fermi (a great target for
> the miscreants/actors) runs stock BIND as it appears in
> RHEL/CentOS/SL, so, to be redundant, what is good enough for the
> national labs is good enough for us.
> Joe won't be happy with us, but we need to be pragmatic.

	Just out of curiosity, have you ever thought about hiring a
	competent admin?


Much of what looks like rudeness in hacker circles is not intended to give
offense. Rather, it's the product of the direct, cut-through-the-bullshit
communications style that is natural to people who are more concerned about
solving problems than making others feel warm and fuzzy.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110219/969df4d4/attachment-0005.sig>