cornel panceac wrote: > in (my) ideal world. money are not necessary. you give me centos, i > give you electricity, or hardware, or an office, etc . since we still > live in money-lenders ruled world, is there a way to contribute > (money) to centos but not directly? like, instead giving money, pay > the bill(s). Core issue, I think, is the rights, privileges etc (the 'ownership' attributes -- whether explicit or implicit) which attach to making payments under most models. If/when my own little earner project fails to earn, it disappears, and little harm is done. Sean