Timothy Murphy wrote: > Dag Wieers wrote: > > >> Regardless, I do think CentOS 5.6 is much more important than CentOS 6.0. >> As there is a direct security impact to users. >> > > Could you explain that more fully, please? > I've actually been puzzled why the developers are bothering with 5.6, > if 6.0 very shortly. > > Very simple - we have existing machines running 5.5 and no recent patches. CentOS 6 is for new builds - they can always wait - need to support working infrastructure first! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: rkampen.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 322 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110220/60f04325/attachment-0005.vcf>