On 2/21/2011 12:18 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 02/21/2011 11:08 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> On 2/21/11 10:35 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>> So you are now saying that you cannot scale out this work to more people >>>> to release faster ? This is something that has to be done by Karanbir only ? >>>> >>> Dag, >>> >>> The packages have to be built in a specific order, preferably the order >>> that they are originally produced in, so that they can be linked >>> properly. Package A builds, then Package B, then Package C. If package >>> B is broken, it needs to be fixed, then Package C needs to be built, etc. >>> >>> This is not something that can be done by several people at the same >>> time in parallel, no. Not and be done correctly. >> Couldn't the process be wrapped into a matrix build in Hudson (or now Jenkins) >> across a large farm of build slaves with a list of successful builds falling out >> at the end? For at least the set of things that succeed in one of the common >> environments... >> >>> Seeing as how we are currently dealing with 2 trees in the QA directory >>> for testing right now (4.9 and 5.6) ... 6.0 will be waiting until we get >>> those out of QA. >> So you are constrained by workspace? Or number of people involved? And you >> don't see that as a problem that could be corrected? >> > > SHUT UP > > if you do not like CentOS ... use something else > > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos step away johnny. These type of responses only further the highminded reputation Centos core is developing. Just ignore it..continue your great work on Centos in general..:) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110221/4a5874a5/attachment-0005.html>