[CentOS] Any update on 5.6 / 6?

Mon Feb 21 18:13:37 UTC 2011
William Warren <hescominsoon at emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com>

On 2/21/2011 12:18 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 02/21/2011 11:08 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On 2/21/11 10:35 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>>> So you are now saying that you cannot scale out this work to more people
>>>> to release faster ? This is something that has to be done by Karanbir only ?
>>>>
>>> Dag,
>>>
>>> The packages have to be built in a specific order, preferably the order
>>> that they are originally produced in, so that they can be linked
>>> properly.  Package A builds, then Package B, then Package C.  If package
>>> B is broken, it needs to be fixed, then Package C needs to be built, etc.
>>>
>>> This is not something that can be done by several people at the same
>>> time in parallel, no.  Not and be done correctly.
>> Couldn't the process be wrapped into a matrix build in Hudson (or now Jenkins)
>> across a large farm of build slaves with a list of successful builds falling out
>> at the end?  For at least the set of things that succeed in one of the common
>> environments...
>>
>>> Seeing as how we are currently dealing with 2 trees in the QA directory
>>> for testing right now (4.9 and 5.6) ... 6.0 will be waiting until we get
>>> those out of QA.
>> So you are constrained by workspace?  Or number of people involved?  And you
>> don't see that as a problem that could be corrected?
>>
>
> SHUT UP
>
> if you do not like CentOS ... use something else
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
step away johnny.  These type of responses only further the highminded 
reputation Centos core is developing.  Just ignore it..continue your 
great work on Centos in general..:)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110221/4a5874a5/attachment-0005.html>