[CentOS] Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?

[Gordon Messmer]

On 02/02/2011 09:22 AM, Larry Vaden wrote:
> What is RH's be-all end-all justification for staying with an ancient
> code base for such important programs as BIND et al?

Directives in the configuration files have changed.  Users of RHEL 
expect to be able to update their systems without anything breaking.