[CentOS] how will CentOS handle the perftools 1.7 vs. 1.6 issue?

[Ray Van Dolson]

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:53:52AM -0600, Larry Vaden wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl <maillists at conactive.com> wrote:
> >> While google perftools is not a part of either SL or CentOS, it *is*
> >> in EPEL, and CentOS users can be users of EPEL
> >
> > Then it's on-topic on the EPEL list, not here. e.g. ask there for an
> > updated version of the package.
> >
> > This wasn't the first instance. This guy has recently started a habit of
> > copying mails (that are not his own it seems) that trip him off right to
> > this list. That is bad practice. I do not want to get more of this.
> 
> My effort was to understand the conditions under which CentOS and/or
> SL would ever go to current edition for a particular component (e.g,
> BIND) and I think I understand now and can resign from the list with
> all due apologies to list members.
> 
> kind regards/ldv

Kai's opinions are not shared by many of us.  You're welcome back any
time.

Thanks,
Ray