[CentOS] Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?
Gordon Messmer
yinyang at eburg.comWed Feb 2 17:52:17 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS] Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?
- Next message: [CentOS] Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 02/02/2011 09:22 AM, Larry Vaden wrote: > What is RH's be-all end-all justification for staying with an ancient > code base for such important programs as BIND et al? Directives in the configuration files have changed. Users of RHEL expect to be able to update their systems without anything breaking.
- Previous message: [CentOS] Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?
- Next message: [CentOS] Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list