On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 04:53:09AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > This is correct, CentOS would add an updated package somewhere (our > people.centos.org site or the centos-testing repository would be the > likely places). > > We want our release to be the same source code where ever possible ... > only changing things as required to meet trademark restrictions. In general, is there a process for deciding whether a package is qualified for inclusion in the centosplus repo? I imagine it's something along the lines of "this package had better be well-built and important enough to break 100% binary compatibility", but I can't find anything specific in the docs. (I personally only use the XFS-related packages out of centosplus, but I can imagine wanting to watch it if other packages appear there that might be useful or interesting.) --keith -- kkeller at wombat.san-francisco.ca.us -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110210/a06947e1/attachment-0003.sig>