----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rajagopal Swaminathan" <raju.rajsand at gmail.com> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> > Sent: Friday, January 7, 2011 6:35:00 PM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] RHEVM List > Greetings, > > On 1/7/11, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Jim Wildman <jim at rossberry.com> > > wrote: > >> On Thu, 6 Jan 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > >> > >>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Eero Volotinen > >>> <eero.volotinen at iki.fi> > >>> wrote: > > > > It was completely useless: hopefully RHEL 6 and CentOS 6 get it > > right. > > > As the OP, I wish to report that I was able to create at least one vm > using RHEV. I followed the guidelines given by Simon and had a > openfiler available on an esx today. > > I am yet to make the iso domain available to install OS in the guest. > > RHEV and RHEV-M rocks so far. Glad to here that. I'm sure you'd also be happy with KVM+virtio+TGT over Centos P.S with this combination you can actually have TGT running on the host meaning max IO performance while RHEM-Manager installed within a VM running on the same host :) > > And Oh I am working with one of RH partners and they do have > legitimate access to support. I recently took up the assignment and > there were some registration stepe etc to be completed with RHN and > the such which are scheduled later. for registering the call. > > Though the idea I proposed about the public mailing list is still > valid. It's valid indeed. When RHEV will open for public evaluation there will be one. In the mean while you have Red Hat's support for your disposal. Regards, Simon. > > If only the entry barrier were not there, we individuals can otherwise > help pass some worthy (or unworthy) comments on the products. > > Thanks for all those responded. > > Regards, > > Rajagopal > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos