On Jan 11, 2011, at 5:17 PM, Digimer wrote: > On 01/11/2011 08:00 PM, Christopher Chan wrote: >> On Wednesday, January 12, 2011 08:51 AM, compdoc wrote: >>>>> Lots of protection for your data? Let's see, super aggressive >>>>> caching and >>> no data journaling only metadata journaling, what on earth are you >>> blabbering about? >>> >>>>> Use XFS with anything that has no BBU cache support or barrier >>>>> support and >>> recent files are toast when there is a crash or sudden power >>> failure. >>> >>>>> Nah, XFS has historically been the fastest at writing and also >>>>> the most >>> dangerous filesystem available on Linux. >>> >>> >>> You're right, I was thinking of zfs. Which does cut write speeds >>> in half... >>> >> >> Huh? There you go blabbering again. There is no native ZFS for >> Linux nor >> will there ever be unless there is a license change. > > Your points may be valid, but their delivery could be more polite. :) I'm actually enjoying the spirited discussion. - aurf