[CentOS] Converting to maildir
Rob Kampen
rkampen at kampensonline.com
Tue Jan 4 18:07:55 UTC 2011
Jason Pyeron wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Les Mikesell
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 12:28
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Converting to maildir
>>
>> On 1/4/2011 10:00 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>>
>>>>>> Many people care about storage format.
>>>>>>
>>>>> And they are misguided in doing so. Details of message
>>>>>
>> storage is
>>
>>>>> an internal [server's] problem.
>>>>>
>>>> So how do you suggest solving that problem when it is in
>>>>
>> fact a problem?
>>
>>> You're missing the point of my objection.
>>>
>> The point doesn't matter. Solving the problem does. And you
>> probably can't solve it without knowing how things work.
>>
>>
>>> That the server is slow or difficult to manage [which
>>>
>> includes backup]
>>
>>> is the issue - not that it uses MBOX [regardless of that its use of
>>> MBOX is the root of the *server's* issue].
>>>
>>> Thinking of it in terms of messages-storage-format is misguided [I
>>> only mention it because I see the MBOX/MH/Maildir/Maildir++/etc...
>>> debate frequently]. This represents, IMO, a flawed
>>>
>> approach to the problem.
>>
>> Yes, you could solve it by ignoring the related physics and
>> throwing infinite resources at it - if you have infinite
>> amounts of money. Or you could do a sysadmin's job and
>> understand the physical constraints and optimize the results
>> you can get from them.
>>
>>
>>> Migration to a new solutions [an IMAP server] that provides better
>>> performance / management is the fix. Incidently, it will almost
>>> certainly not use MBOX.
>>>
>> Odd that you would mention that, just after saying you
>> shouldn't care...
>> And in fact, some servers (e.g. dovecot) may handle more
>>
>
> Thank you. http://wiki.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/Maildir
>
> I am now going to look for a setup guide of procmail->Maildir->dovecot on
> RHEL/Centos
>
I used the centos wiki guides and they are GREAT - thanks to the team
that put them together.
>
>> than one storage format, leaving it up to the admin to choose
>> which is best.
>>
>>
>>> If you are 'manually' crawling around in your message-store [the
>>> *only* case where you'd actually care much about storage format]
>>> indicates something else it wrong [as well].
>>>
>> Your backup system will most certainly be crawling around
>> your message store.
>>
>>
>
> -Jason
>
> --
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> - -
> - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
> - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 -
> - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333 Baltimore, Maryland 21218 -
> - -
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: rkampen.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 329 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110104/2a98909b/attachment.vcf>
More information about the CentOS
mailing list