[CentOS] Recompiling source rpms for i386, i686 and x86_64 on the same box?
Nico Kadel-Garcia
nkadel at gmail.comFri Jan 14 00:51:44 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS] Recompiling source rpms for i386, i686 and x86_64 on the same box?
- Next message: [CentOS] Recompiling source rpms for i386, i686 and x86_64 on the same box?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Mister IT Guru <misteritguru at gmx.com> wrote: > I'm not 100% comfortable with mixing server tasks - especially when the > boxes are managed using puppet - (google it, puppet is frikkin awesome!) > I always assumed that with paravirtualisation that I'll get near native > speeds. Either way, whatever the needs determine - it seems that > building a mock environment is the way to go. I'm looking for a mock > mailing list, but I guess either this list or the fedora list should be > sufficient, right? The problem is that the "server" may not be pristine, and may introduce some very strange dependencies and inconsistencies for your RPM's. One RPM requires samba-server? No problem! Another for a third party Samba utilities requires their cifs-utils? No problem! Until you try to install them both at the same time on the same server....... Then you need a flexible, replaceable, rebuildable and stripped down environment used only for building the relevant RPM's. Mock gives exactly this, with alternative configurations for RPM's based on EPEL, or on RPMforge, to satisfy dependencies as configured by your local author. It's pretty sweet, and the recent versions of it much, much faster and smaller than the old ones.
- Previous message: [CentOS] Recompiling source rpms for i386, i686 and x86_64 on the same box?
- Next message: [CentOS] Recompiling source rpms for i386, i686 and x86_64 on the same box?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list